Foreword

The FAO Forestry Department promotes, among others, the responsible use of wood as an environmentally friendly raw material. In the last decades, wood and wood-based products have been faced with stronger competition from substitute materials, such as plastics, concrete, steel, glass or aluminium, as these materials appear to offer wider options to the customers. Some of the factors that can influence customers’ decisions on what kind of end products to acquire include marketing efforts, product prices, quality, durability and image.

Conflicting and often opposing views exist about the environmental consequences of using wood products. On the one hand, environmental concerns related to deforestation, forest degradation and losses in biodiversity lead to a negative image of wood products, in particular those made of wood from the tropics. On the other, a wide range of producers and consumers are aware of their positive environmental aspects. For example, wood is a renewable and recyclable raw material, which cannot only be used in different end products but can also become a source of renewable energy. In fact, a wider utilization of wood products made from well-managed resources can contribute significantly to achieving sustainable development.

However, it should be noted that many of the environmental advantages of wood products had not been scientifically evaluated until the early 1990s, when the life cycle assessment (LCA) approach was developed.

The present study tries to provide factual information on the environmental and energy balances of wood in certain products compared to major substitutes, applying the LCA methodology. It intends to assist policy-makers, producers, consumers and other interest groups to better understand the environmental benefits of using wood, instead of non-renewable raw materials, in the manufacture of some products such as, for instance, houses, sheds, window frames and flooring. Future efforts should also be made to follow the same methodology in analysing different solid wood products, products made of composite materials including wood, or wood-based panels for various uses.

Specific thanks are recorded to Dr Mohammad Scharai-Rad from the University of Hamburg, Department of Wood Technology, and Dr Johannes Welling from the Federal Research Centre for Forestry and Forest Products in Hamburg, for their excellent work in carrying out the review and related analysis.

Wulf Killmann
Director
Forest Products Division
Forestry Department

Related Posts

Pieces of salada crisp bread, broken up and stacked up

SALADA

I have been a scout leader for more than a decade now and one of the things we learnt and what we try and teach the kids is SALADA. This is an acronym for “Stop Assess Listen Allocate Do Assess again”. It is also symbolised by a piece of the brand salada crisp bread that you try and stuff into your mouth in one big piece – which does hardly work – without pain that is. So the lesson from this is also that you need to break it down into chunks to eat it. Just like you have to break down your task into manageable chunks to do them. This aligns with the “Allocate” in SALADA, ie break it up and give your team members jobs.

COP26 – Just another talk? Up to you!

It’s that time of the year again – ground hog day – another global leader meeting to tackle climate change. Or to talk about tackling climate change.
Do whatever you can – at home or work, in your job, in your projects.
It’s up to you, not anyone else.

Horrible Hybrids – A reminder

Michael Braungart and William McDonough called them “horrible hybrids” in their 2002 book “Crade to Cradle”. Things that are fused together from different materials that cannot be separated and thus not recycled.

Soybeans in a supermarket in China

What to eat those days?

Being married to a vegetarian and not cooking extra at home, the family tend to eat vegetarian – with lots of soy products. So this post is more of a collection of thoughts around soy products. And yet again there’s confusing information out there. The general perception is that soy is good for you: Non-animal, vegan, high in protein, etc.

But then you do a bit of research and googling and find quite contradicting information as well.

Kiwibuilds 100,000 homes progress

The average build numbers according to my article published in 2018 would have been ~30,000 homes by now. The actual stats are somewhat lower than that: 934 – yes: 934. Even if we would say that starting up is hard and the initial output would have been lower, would we maybe not have expected 20,000 homes? But we got 934.

Leave a Reply