Today I got an email in from a manufacturer of a new plastic wall panel: AKRIL.
I had a look at the website at www.akril.co.nz.

They claim it is environmenatlly friendly and “can be recycled under recyclable plastic number 7”.
Well, this is No. 7:

Number 7 Plastics: Miscellaneous
Found in: Three- and five-gallon water bottles, ‘bullet-proof’ materials, sunglasses, DVDs, iPod and computer cases, signs and displays, certain food containers, nylon
Recycling: Number 7 plastics have traditionally not been recycled, though some curbside programs now take them.
Recycled into: Plastic lumber, custom-made products

A wide variety of plastic resins that don’t fit into the previous categories are lumped into number 7.

So, it cannot be recycled, max downcycled into low grade products. It will not be taken in NZ at all and will end up in the landfill. If the manufacturer has no product stewardship in place and does not take returns, you end up with waste.

They also claim “Akril has also been awarded a green star rating by The Good Environmental Choice of Australia
Well, GECA does not rate any products in terms of green star, it’s got absolutely nothing to do with it.
I had a look at the GECA requirements for plastic boards:

3.2.2 Plastics
3.2.2.1 Resin Identification Codes
Certified products must mark each individual plastic product or component weighing greater than 100g with an
appropriate resin identification code promulgated by the Plastics and Chemical Industry Association.
http://www.pacia.org.au
Exemptions may be made for products where the nature of the manufacturing process or the size and shape of
the product restrict the application of the plastics resin identification code on the product. Exempt products will
ensure that appropriate information describing disposal methods for the product, including the relevant

That’s all to it! Ergo, you put a sticker with a plastics “7” symbol on it and there is your GECA certification (after you paid the invoice).

I send an email to AKRIL asking them why they believe they have an environmentally friendly product, but have not received any reply.

Related Posts

Pieces of salada crisp bread, broken up and stacked up

SALADA

I have been a scout leader for more than a decade now and one of the things we learnt and what we try and teach the kids is SALADA. This is an acronym for “Stop Assess Listen Allocate Do Assess again”. It is also symbolised by a piece of the brand salada crisp bread that you try and stuff into your mouth in one big piece – which does hardly work – without pain that is. So the lesson from this is also that you need to break it down into chunks to eat it. Just like you have to break down your task into manageable chunks to do them. This aligns with the “Allocate” in SALADA, ie break it up and give your team members jobs.

COP26 – Just another talk? Up to you!

It’s that time of the year again – ground hog day – another global leader meeting to tackle climate change. Or to talk about tackling climate change.
Do whatever you can – at home or work, in your job, in your projects.
It’s up to you, not anyone else.

Horrible Hybrids – A reminder

Michael Braungart and William McDonough called them “horrible hybrids” in their 2002 book “Crade to Cradle”. Things that are fused together from different materials that cannot be separated and thus not recycled.

Soybeans in a supermarket in China

What to eat those days?

Being married to a vegetarian and not cooking extra at home, the family tend to eat vegetarian – with lots of soy products. So this post is more of a collection of thoughts around soy products. And yet again there’s confusing information out there. The general perception is that soy is good for you: Non-animal, vegan, high in protein, etc.

But then you do a bit of research and googling and find quite contradicting information as well.

Kiwibuilds 100,000 homes progress

The average build numbers according to my article published in 2018 would have been ~30,000 homes by now. The actual stats are somewhat lower than that: 934 – yes: 934. Even if we would say that starting up is hard and the initial output would have been lower, would we maybe not have expected 20,000 homes? But we got 934.

Leave a Reply