Via, 19/08/2011

Recycling operators say Auckland Council is wasting its time revamping rubbish disposal without talking to people who know the industry.

Lawyer Stephen Franks told councillors yesterday they were heading for an expensive public consultation exercise on a waste minimisation plan that had no chance of working.

It would demolish rather than improve a successful industry, said Mr Franks, who represents the Waste and Recycling Council – 30 businesses that collect, recycle, reuse and dispose of waste.

Members handled more than 250,000 tonnes of material that was recycled and more than 220,000 tonnes of waste that went to landfill.

The group is reacting to a council decision in March to look into taking control of the region’s rubbish collected at the kerb and bringing in a user-pays system.

At present, the council has operational control over only 15 per cent.

A possible way to do this is through a joint-venture with the main landfill and waste transfer station owners.

Councillors decided this on the basis of information presented in an official waste assessment paper.

However, Mr Franks said the paper gave councillors no appreciation of the costs and risks.

“There is concern that the assumptions about savings are not able to be substantiated.

“It’s a curious order in which to do things – to adopt a strategic direction and put a strait-jacket around your options and then say you will do the analysis.”

Waste and Recycling Council members wanted the council to reconsider and “look coldly” at the risks and whether there was a problem.

“You’ve had a 20 per cent reduction in waste over the past couple of years … that’s extraordinary.”

Members urged cutting waste going to landfill by, for example, measures to separate food waste at the kerbside.

After Mr Franks’ appeal, councillors Chris Fletcher and Cameron Brewer successfully sought a council resolution that officers ensure that interested waste industry leaders be invited to attend a consultation on the draft waste minimisation plan.

Councillor Mike Lee reminded members that ratepayers paid $84 million a year for waste disposal.

They, too, deserved a fair and objective consultation programme about how to reduce waste and ensure their money was spent as efficiently as possible.

The council’s manager of infrastructure and environmental services, John Dragicevich, said the waste assessment had been updated to give the council confidence that it was proceeding on a sound basis.

He said the council needed a new waste minimisation bylaw by October next year when the present one expired A draft plan will go out for public consultation early next year.

By Wayne Thompson | Email Wayne

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *