Green Thinker Network and the confusion about GREEN

I received an email today about the latest Green Thinker Network (http://www.greenthinkernetwork.com/) updates.

On the front page you will find the winner of the “sustainable product competition 2011” and also the runner-up.

The champion is a “smog-eating tile”. I must say that I am somewhat disturbed by this. While the idea might be great, I though that sustainability is about the long run, the future, future generations and our kids etc. Having a short term solution to a man made problem, that does not make the problem as such any better or make it go away is like bashing your head continuously against a wall and taking painkillers for the pain.

 

 

Can we please stop inventing workarounds and mitigations for originally wrong and bad system design? We all know we will be running out of – it's just a matter of time. Whoever ignores that fact has no idea about the basics of and is pretty ignorant or stubborn – or is just interested in short term money making.

The way we commute will change and it won't be fissile fuels. And as long as we do not have greened our supply systems, it won't be biofuel either as it uses too much energy to manufacture. Yes it kind of grows on trees, but not in a readily usable form.

And the runner-up is basically worse: electric underfloor heating blankets. Seriously, what is green and sustainable about it? A product made in the USA and claims to be 98% efficient in converting energy into heat. That's great, so we only have 30% loss in general in the generation of electricity and approx 30% loss in transmission and then 98% in application, so lets' see: X*70%*70%*98% = X*.7*.7*.98 = X*0.4802.

In comparison heat pump: X*.7*.7*3.5 = X*1.715

or wood burner: approx X*.7 while using a fully renewable resource

EECA fact sheet: Wood energy: using wood as a renewable energy source

Leave a Reply

Related Posts

Another year, another COP. What will be the results? At this stage more questions than answers.
World leaders gathering for the 28th Conferences of the Parties (COPs) in a milestone moment as nations for the first time formally review progress since the Paris Agreement 2015.
When a building is demolished and rebuilt, it results in what can be termed as ‘double emissions’. This is because two sets of construction materials are required – one for the original building and another for the new structure.
We are doing composting to add nutrients to the soil, adding microbes and attracting worms, providing a healthy soil that has good moisture retention and grows healthy and strong plants, it’s all about soil health.
The Green Building Council did commission a report to explore the embodied carbon of New Zealand’s buildings and potential reduction potentials. Obviously, buildings may vary greatly in their embodied carbon but this is some average assumptions.
A little car with lots of potential and a cult community – for good reasons. They are efficient and keep going, easy care and maintenance. And now they prove to be future proof as well as they can simply be